- Bitcoin hits $110K, but on-chain activity remains muted, with low fees and thin mempool usage.
- Users shift to CEXs and TRON, reinforcing Bitcoin’s evolution into a passive store of value.
Bitcoin [BTC] breached $110,000 on the 22nd of May, but the blockchain activity tells a different story.
While Bitcoin’s price dominates headlines, its on-chain activity has quietly dropped to record lows, highlighting a gap between valuation and actual usage.
As users shift to centralized exchanges (CEXs) and cheaper networks for daily transactions, Bitcoin is evolving—moving away from its role as a peer-to-peer currency and solidifying itself as a high-value store of wealth.
Is this the final confirmation that Bitcoin has become digital gold in function, not just in name?
Subdued demand in a booming market
Mean transaction fees hover around $1.50 – an anomaly in the context of previous bull markets.
As the chart shows, past rallies in 2017, 2021, and late 2023 saw mean fees spike above $60 and even past $120 due to memory pool (mempool) congestion and surging on-chain speculation.
Source: Alphractal
This cycle, the mempool remains calm with minimal fee pressure, despite Bitcoin’s rising price.
Transactional demand has not increased—users are holding their assets or using centralized platforms instead of moving value on-chain.
Where’s the frenzy?
In past bull markets, Bitcoin’s mempool swelled with tens of thousands of unconfirmed transactions, clear signs of speculative urgency. The current cycle, despite record prices, is quieter.
Source: Alphractal
Mempool activity in 2025 is thin compared to the surges of 2017 and 2021, when transaction backlogs routinely exceeded 150,000. Today, congestion is minimal, signaling a notable lack of urgency among users.
Traders are increasingly sidelining the base layer of speculation, opting instead for faster, cheaper alternatives – or simply holding. The Bitcoin network itself isn’t reflecting the hype.
Quiet success or shrinking retail?
SegWit adoption has soared since 2021, now accounting for the overwhelming majority of Bitcoin transactions. This shift has improved block space efficiency, reduced fees, and enabled smoother throughput.
Yet, the dominance of SegWit today… may be a double-edged sword.
On one hand, it reflects optimization – fewer bytes per transaction. On the other, the relative absence of non-SegWit activity could point to a drop in casual or legacy users.
Bitcoin’s current usage profile seems skewed toward high-efficiency, institutional-scale transactions, not the grassroots, everyday traffic that once clogged the network during retail-driven surges.
Where is the activity going?
Centralized exchanges now handle most transaction flows, while networks like TRON lead retail and stablecoin transfers—especially USDT—due to low fees and instant finality.
Meanwhile, Lightning Network adoption for everyday peer-to-peer payments has slowed, impacted by UX challenges and limited liquidity.
As the crypto industry evolves, users increasingly prefer centralized or highly optimized systems for routine transactions.
